Dall’intervista a Edward Snowden di Alan Rusbridger sul Guardian di oggi:

Can he give an example of what made him feel uneasy? “Many of the people searching through the haystacks were young, enlisted guys, 18 to 22 years old. They’ve suddenly been thrust into a position of extraordinary responsibility, where they now have access to all your private records. In the course of their daily work, they stumble across something that is completely unrelated in any sort of necessary sense – for example, an intimate nude photo of someone in a sexually compromising situation. But they’re extremely attractive. So what do they do? They turn around in their chair and they show a co-worker. And their co-worker says, ‘Oh, hey, that’s great. Send that to Bill down the way’, and then Bill sends it to George, George sends it to Tom, and sooner or later this person’s whole life has been seen by all of these other people.”

The analysts don’t discuss such things in the NSA cafeterias, but back in the office “anything goes, more or less. You’re in a vaulted space. Everybody has sort of similar clearances, everybody knows everybody. It’s a small world. It’s never reported, because the auditing of these systems is incredibly weak. The fact that records of your intimate moments have been taken from your private communication stream, from the intended recipient, and given to the government, without any specific authorisation, without any specific need, is itself a violation of your rights. Why is that in the government database?”


5 commenti a “A vaulted space”

  1. Paolo d.a. dice:

    Ricordo un dipendente di un provider romano pre-2000 che raccontava di come si passavano le pause pranzo. Pratiche ben note e diffuse. Le email degli altri sono da sempre uno spasso per tanta tante gente. Per dire.

  2. Visto nel Web – 140 | Ok, panico dice:

    […] A vaulted space ::: manteblog […]

  3. pepato dice:

    @Paolo d.a: infatti, hai ragione. Mi chiedo perché Mante abbia scelto questo passaggio che mi sembra il meno interessante di tutta l’intervista – a meno di non voler citare quello forse più emotivamente stimolante.

  4. Marco dice:

    Non notare la differenza tra NSA e “un provider romano pre-2000” mi pare quanto meno bizzarro

  5. Paolo d.a. dice:

    @Marco
    la differenza è abissale. Ma ci illudiamo spesso di poter gestire la nostra privacy, in questo senso è utile rendersi conto cos’è che ci fa arrabbiare e cosa riteniamo invece – tuttosommato – accettabile.

    @pepato
    Veramente a me sembra che quella citata sia la parte più rilevante.